Citation verification · Courts of Australia
True·Cite

THEORETICAL BASIS

Why the check sits outside the thing that writes.

A tool that generates cannot audit itself. Whatever verifies an authority has to sit outside the thing that produced it. TrueCite is that outside: a deterministic gate built on a theory of delegation and verification, not on a language model.

  1. Anchor. Human intention is raised to a citation identity that can be checked — not to a prompt.
  2. Compare. The identity is matched against an admitted, versioned index, and where no index tier holds it, against the record for that citation on a named court or law library site, read at a stated time. A named source is the source of truth, not the model and not the submitting party.
  3. Name the source, always. Every finding says which source answered it, on what basis, and when it was observed. A source located at the time of the check is labelled as that and never dressed as the court’s own index; the reader can go to it and see for themselves.
  4. Do not elevate. Client materials cannot turn unresolved into verified. Silence is a lawful outcome.
  5. Record. The finding carries its evidence basis, source, date, coverage and limits. That record is the public proof; the books are not.

The programs are the bones. Intelligence, if it is used at all, is flesh around them. TrueCite ships the bone: an identity stamp a practice system can embed.

Statement of method · Embed